show your benchmark numbers

[screwballl]

Some screen shots from my new E6400 @ stock 2.13GHz



E6400 and E6600 (right):


PCMark05 = 5598 @ 2.13GHz
3DMark06 = 4710 @ 2.13GHz

E6600 @ 2.4GHz with 3DMark05 = 8703
for some reason the CPU tests scored at 5.2 and 6.2fps.. not sure why.. oh well...


I will add more as I get more benchmarks done and possibly OC it in the future

Edit: Since I got a Kill-A-Watt, I will post some of the numbers for my machines here, all systems are running full load with F@H:

E6400:
120V, 0.36A, 27W, 44 VA, 0.61-0.62 PF

XP3000+:
119.5-120V, 1.73A, 137W, 206 VA, 0.66-0.67 PF

XP-M 2600+:
119.5V, 1.42-1.44A, 109-112W, 166-172VA, 0.65 PF

Dell 8200 P4 1.8GHz
120V, 1.26-1.29A, 119W, 153VA, 0.78 PF

So by switching to this new C2D, I am using 20% of the power I was using with the XP3000+ system. Not sure if its due to the age of that system and power supply but it is a very big difference. Looking at the systems here, they are all in the same 110-140W range except for this new system. I would like to also check my mother in laws 1 year old CeleronD Dell to see how it places in the ranks of these older systems (numbers to come). Is it the efficiency of this kickass Corsair 620W powering new low draw components? Hard to say.
The numbers were lower on all of the systems when F@H was stopped and the system is idle. The E6400 system did not budge on the numbers when F@H was stopped or both cores were pushed 100% load with TAT.

[screwballl]

wow no takers????

Just a small update here, re-ran the PCMark05 benchmark and with the E6600 I got 5872. The E6400 got 5598 on the same test.