HardwareLogic

Go Back   HardwareLogic > General Discussions > General Computing > Overclocking
Home Forums Rules All AlbumsBlogs Subscriptions Register Mark Forums Read

Overclocking Want to practice the dark arts and void your warranty? Get and give overclocking help here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old October 2nd, 2008   #1
 
PTRMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,015
Default OC questions

Using the HL guide and others I've started OCing my rig. How long do you typically run Prime95? Some say 2 hours is good, others say as much as 24. I'm left confused...

Also read that Blend is good for OC as a whole, but small FFTs is best just for CPU.

During normal use the rig folds 24/7; I only occasionally use it for surfing/gaming/video editing (4-5 hours per weekday; 15+ hours per weekend).





Last edited by PTRMAN; October 2nd, 2008 at 09:06.
PTRMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 2nd, 2008   #2
T-Rex
 
polobunny's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,109
Blog Entries: 6
Default Re: OC questions

24hrs is good. It's long, a lot deem it unnecessary but that's something I prefer to do. One of those "just in case" thing. If your rig isn't stable for 24hrs, then it's not stable for a split second either. Those inconsistencies due to overclocking can pop up anytime, whether they popped up at 23 hours and 59 minutes or at the first second your ran Prime95.

I suggest you run IntelBurnTest, one of my current favorite. It's very quick (under 20 minutes is usually enough) at finding problems.
IntelBurnTest - The new stress-testing program - XtremeSystems Forums
Use a half stress, 20 passes and watch that all the linpack results are the same. If they are, it's stable. If they aren't, it's not stable.



polobunny is online now   Reply With Quote
Old October 2nd, 2008   #3
 
PTRMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,015
Default Re: OC questions

So I passed the test with the settings you suggested. Clearly a 20-minute test isn't the same as a 24-hour test, so I guess I'm off to run Prime95 for many hours now...

Or would I be better served by trying a higher OC clock first? Use IntelBurnTest to find first failure level, then back off that and run Prime 95?





Last edited by PTRMAN; October 2nd, 2008 at 10:09.
PTRMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 2nd, 2008   #4
4GHz or Bust
 
drew and not u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: A different kind of Green Computing
Posts: 2,138
Default Re: OC questions

I'll typically run orthos for an hour once I've got the overclock I want. If that passes I'll usually save the OC profile, and then right before bed I'll start an orthos run again overnight just to be sure. That intelburn utility looks interesting, I'll have to try that out this evening.



drew and not u is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 2nd, 2008   #5
oh noes
 
theburan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rapid City, SD (ish)
Posts: 973
Blog Entries: 3
Default Re: OC questions

IntelBurntest is much more stressful than orthos/prime95, that's for sure. We're talking stressful enough to heat a cpu up an extra 10c over what it'll hit in orthos.... so 20 minutes of that is a really, really nifty way to test a cpu.




e8500@4ghz|Asus P5k-e WiFi| 4gb OCZ ReaperX|2x 3870's|1.3tb storage space|MSI tv tuner.
theburan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 2nd, 2008   #6
T-Rex
 
polobunny's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,109
Blog Entries: 6
Default Re: OC questions

Quote:
Originally Posted by drew and not u View Post
I'll typically run orthos for an hour once I've got the overclock I want. If that passes I'll usually save the OC profile, and then right before bed I'll start an orthos run again overnight just to be sure. That intelburn utility looks interesting, I'll have to try that out this evening.
Quote:
Originally Posted by theburan View Post
IntelBurntest is much more stressful than orthos/prime95, that's for sure. We're talking stressful enough to heat a cpu up an extra 10c over what it'll hit in orthos.... so 20 minutes of that is a really, really nifty way to test a cpu.
Yup. More stressful, but also more stringent than Orthos/Prime95. I've had overclocks passing 24+hrs ORTHOS runs but fail after 20 passes of IntelBurnTest. The downside is that it's Intel only.



polobunny is online now   Reply With Quote
Old October 2nd, 2008   #7
4GHz or Bust
 
drew and not u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: A different kind of Green Computing
Posts: 2,138
Default Re: OC questions

Looks like the current version is AMD compatible. Tested it out on my laptop at work (die computer, die!), took the CPU to 91 (within like 3*c of tjMax), orthos got it up to about 80*. Hopefully my 8400 will pass, I hate having to add voltage...



drew and not u is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 2nd, 2008   #8
lvl 63 Bargain Hunter
 
NoctisReitop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 506
Default Re: OC questions

I'm not going to claim that I'm any good at overlcocking. Lately, I've been trying to cut the stock cpu's voltage to lower temps (being my board automatically changes voltage higher than it needs). I've been running stressprime (will try IntelBurnTest) and often, it took 13+ hours (two separate voltages) before it reported a failure; and as previously stated, if it can fail at 13 hours it can fail in 13 minutes. I believe that anything lower than 13 hours is too little -- just from my experience. I can't say I've dedicated 24 hours yet, either. Just my two cents.



NoctisReitop is online now   Reply With Quote
Old October 2nd, 2008   #9
 
PTRMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,015
Default Re: OC questions

FSB 380 w/IBT = OK
400 = fail
390= fail
running Prime 95 @ 380 overnight...

With a little luck then it's on to the memory timings!

Does anyone use a memory heatsink/fan? They seem very cheap on NewEgg -
Newegg.com - Memory, Fan&Heatsinks, Memory & Chipset Cooling, Fans & Heatsinks




PTRMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 5th, 2008   #10
 
PTRMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,015
Default Re: OC questions

OK, so I'm stable at FSB 380Mhz / 3.42Mhz overall. OCed the memory to 4-4-4-15 (so far) from 5-5-5-15. Gonna try 4-4-4-12 now. Haven't done any volt mods yet. What next?

Still wondering about cooling. Using EVGA Precision I'm up to a stable core of 625/shader of 1464 (linked to core)/memory of 925. Will adding something like a VF1000 cooler help (just have stock now)?

OCing CPU, memory, and (potentially) VGA, each of which might need its own dedicated heatsink/fan. Just wondering if I'd be better off going with WC for all of this. Is it practical to try to cool CPU/NB/RAM and VGA with water? Or am I better off loading up with heatsink/fans on each item and letting the case fans do the aircooling?




PTRMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  HardwareLogic > General Discussions > General Computing > Overclocking

Tags
questions


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WC questions PTRMAN Cooling 3 October 24th, 2008 18:25
Two questions. diabloplayer75 Software & OSs 9 April 14th, 2008 19:17
Again with the Questions. LadyFrost Software & OSs 9 May 27th, 2007 02:17
Questions.... Kiwi2022 HL Lounge 6 March 11th, 2007 04:37
Hello all...some questions please Loose Bruce Overclocking 11 February 25th, 2007 07:44


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 20:16.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
© HardwareLogic 2005 - 2008. All Rights Reserved


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52