HardwareLogic

Go Back   HardwareLogic > General Discussions > General Computing > Overclocking
Home Forums Rules All AlbumsBlogs Subscriptions Register Mark Forums Read

Overclocking Want to practice the dark arts and void your warranty? Get and give overclocking help here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old October 12th, 2007   #1
Edging towards disaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Third rock from the sun.
Posts: 111
Default OC'd folder question

Something that just crossed my mind:
What affects F@H more? Raw CPU speed or the same cpu speed with a higher FSB?
With a cpu speed of 3.6 which would fold faster?
10X360, 9X400, 8X450
If I can reach a certain cpu speed would it be benifical to jockey the FSB or the multiplier to max?



Intel E8400 @ 4.05GHZ - EP35-DS3P
Zalman 9700NT - 4 Gig Mushkin DDR2-1066
Two Sapphire HD 4870 512mb in CrossFire
PC P & C 750 watt - Samsung 216BW LCD
Samsung DVD-RW - Logitec Z-640 speakers
Linksys WRT54GL Router - CM 690 Case
Seagate 250gig - Vista Home Premium 64bit
dedgar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 12th, 2007   #2
Stoopid Head
 
Yellowhello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pacific Grove, CA
Posts: 4,254
Default Re: OC'd folder question

The only reason you would have a really high FSB speed was for better RAM performance... So I guess the question is how much RAM speed affects F@H, if at all.



Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 + Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme
DFI Blood Iron P35-T2RL + Thermalright HR-05 IFX
2GB G.Skill 800MHz F2-6400PHU2-2GBHZ
EVGA GeForce 8800GTS 320MB
Silverstone Decathlon 650W
Western Digital 250GB SATA II


Last edited by Yellowhello; November 9th, 2007 at 05:42.
Yellowhello is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 9th, 2007   #3
Modder-ator
 
gvblake22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tempe Desert
Posts: 6,356
Blog Entries: 1
Default Re: OC'd folder question

Pure increases in core clock speed should improve folding performance the most. After that, a faster memory speed would make the difference, followed closely by FSB. The 8x450 speed would be your best bet as long as your memory wasn't running slower than it would be at 9x400 or 10x360 (it will depend on your CPU:Memory divider).



gvblake22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  HardwareLogic > General Discussions > General Computing > Overclocking

Tags
folder, ocd, question


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Welcome a New Folder! robodude666 The HL F@H Team 89 2 Weeks Ago 02:13
changing the administrator folder name hanafi Software & OSs 2 February 15th, 2008 18:48
OC'd for over a year Gig-O-Ram Overclocking 14 March 30th, 2007 13:40
OC'D FX70 vs. QX6700 fps justin Processors 10 January 24th, 2007 06:55
How much would you pay for a used, non-OC'd FX-55? garetjax Processors 6 June 5th, 2006 21:24


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:41.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
© HardwareLogic 2005 - 2008. All Rights Reserved


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49