![]() |
| |||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | All Albums | Blogs | Subscriptions | Register | Mark Forums Read |
| Peripherals Hard Drives, Optical Drives, Mice, Keyboards, Speakers, and Monitors. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 |
| Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 44
| i am building a new system for gamming - i am going to run vista ultimate 64bit -- allready purchased vista -- > my harddrive setup thoughts: --> WD 80gig sata ( running vista only)(updates)(virues scan) --> WD 640gig sata --> WD 640gig SATA i would like to put the 640s in raid -- but i would like to partition the one down to 3 partitions of 200gigs - would the other drive do the same??? so i would have:::: C:/ vista (80gig) 1 physical drive D: 200gigs (partition from the 640 drive) E:same F:same g:40gig then another 640 - setup the same way |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 44
| i am not totally sure - raid1 or raid0 -- i want the second to backup the one.. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Helper Person In General Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 1,535
| You need to Google and read about RAID. If you want redundancy you want RAID 1. That will offer backup for a small trade off of speed. Ron |
| | |
| | #5 |
| ButtHead Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,217
| |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Functional Alcoholic | LMFAO, I hadn't seen that one yet. I am thinking what you want is RAID 1, but that's not a back up that's redundancy. Only protects you against drive failure. This is kinda out dated, but it should give you a basic Idea of RAID RAID Guide Last edited by Hitman; July 9th, 2008 at 19:56. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Uh.. Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 33
| ![]() ASUS M50VM Laptop on the go! |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Colonel Calamity | Quote:
![]() Thanks HL and Corsair! My opinions are my own and not representative of this site or its members. | |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Functional Alcoholic | You can partition a RAID 1 array and this would accomplish what he was wanting to do. I would advise against it, but it is possible. |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Colonel Calamity | I agree, I can see doing this with RAID1 which has a copy of each partition and data on both drives... but doing this with RAID0 is pointless (and maybe not possible, I haven't dealt with it enough to know for sure), you may as well just keep the 2 drives non-RAID and split up the partitions as stated... running RAID0, if one drive fails, you not only have to worry about a single drive but also 3-6 partitions worth of data gone, whereas if you left them non-RAID (or RAID 0), if one drive fails, you will still have access to the data and partitions on the good drive(s). ![]() Thanks HL and Corsair! My opinions are my own and not representative of this site or its members. |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| raid |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Raid set-up | Badluck Inc | General Computing | 6 | February 15th, 2008 02:22 |
| 4 HD in Raid? | Nikolai | Peripherals | 4 | August 18th, 2007 21:35 |
| RAID | Jokerswild | HL Lounge | 3 | July 1st, 2007 21:19 |
| Raid 0 or no? | sean126 | Peripherals | 8 | June 15th, 2007 21:36 |
| What's with RAID? | hackman2007 | Peripherals | 10 | December 19th, 2006 20:21 |