![]() |
| |||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | All Albums | Blogs | Subscriptions | Register | Mark Forums Read |
| Graphics Covering everything from drivers to overclocking. If you need help with a Video Card, this is the place. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 |
| Founder of Technical Arts Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Iowa
Posts: 78
| I'm trying to figure out what the big deal with the Quadro FX series is. At Nvidia Online Store - Product Information nVidia sells the Quadro FX 4600 for $2000. However, nVidia links to NewEgg for sale of the GeForce GTX 280 Newegg.com - EVGA 01G-P3-1280-AR GeForce GTX 280 1GB 512-bit GDDR3 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready SLI Supported Video Card - Desktop Graphics / Video Cards for less that one-fourth of that price. Here are the specs, though: Quadro FX 4600: 768MB GDDR3 384-bit 67.2GBps GeForce GTX 280: 1GB GDDR3 512-bit 141.7GBps So, is it just me, or is the GeForce GTX 280 better for less than one-fourth the price? What am I missing? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Aeria gloris Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: NY
Posts: 1,622
| Quadro line is mainly for work stations, for people who are doing CAD and DCC as the geforce line is for us gamers. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Modder-ator | What azianai said is exactly correct. The Quadro series cards are engineered (and marketed) for a totally different audience and use than the GeForce series. Quadro cards are really not meant to play games and will never perform well, so make sure you are looking at the GeForce cards if you are playing games. Kindof like the difference between the FireGL and Radeon cards from AMD/ATI. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Colonel Calamity | plenty of information from nvidia here: http://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro_geforce.html granted it is from 2003 but still applies ![]() Thanks HL and Corsair! My opinions are my own and not representative of this site or its members. Last edited by screwballl; July 24th, 2008 at 12:56. |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| T-Rex | Quote:
Quadro FX 4600 = GeForce 8800GTX Using RivaTuner and a strap you can unlock certain cards to function like Quadro cards. | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Colonel Calamity | the Quadro is for high detail/high resolution usage but sucks as a gaming card.. consumer based Geforce cards are for high performance fast calculations, but if you use it for workstation/CAD type duties, it will be slow. 2 completely different architectures, like Opteron and Athlon ![]() Thanks HL and Corsair! My opinions are my own and not representative of this site or its members. Last edited by screwballl; July 24th, 2008 at 13:23. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Founder of Technical Arts Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Iowa
Posts: 78
| Okay, I guess I forgot to mention something. I get the fact that one is for work and the other is for play. But what is different about them? How do they each compensate for their intended use compared to the other? Is the 4x price difference justified? I'm also not sure I understand CAD. I believe it stands for Computer Aided Drafting, but how is needing graphical power for that different from needing graphical power for an intense First-Person Shooter? If anything, I'd think you'd need more for the FPS... |
| | |
| | #8 |
| oh noes | I think alot of it boils down to the drivers and the stability... these work station cards are probably engineered so that once you install them, they will not break or crash during a calculation or something like that, no matter what, and also the drivers are probably written to focus on different things more important to cad/workstation type stuff. ![]() e8500@4ghz|Asus P5k-e WiFi| 4gb OCZ ReaperX|2x 3870's|1.3tb storage space|MSI tv tuner. |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| T-Rex | Quote:
Edit: theburan: There's nothing to them other than the fact they're detected as Quadros rather than GeForce. A simple BIOS flash won't fix this however, it's not so simple. That's why people mess with the drivers to make them believe they own a Quadro instead of a GeForce. It works relatively well, and you'll agree with me it's much cheaper so it's a somewhat great solution for CAD beginners which can't afford a Quadro or a Fire GL. Last edited by polobunny; July 24th, 2008 at 15:08. | |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| 4600, comparison, graphics card, quadro, versus |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Quadro FX 4700X2 | azianai | Graphics | 2 | June 26th, 2008 05:00 |
| Inspiron 4600 | Lylan | General Computing | 16 | January 12th, 2008 12:24 |
| PC 4600 memory? | coshkara | Memory | 9 | August 2nd, 2007 12:53 |
| Core 2 Quadro | polobunny | Processors | 8 | September 14th, 2006 11:47 |
| 6600gt vs Quadro FX 540 | fps justin | Graphics | 6 | August 4th, 2006 15:22 |