HardwareLogic

Go Back   HardwareLogic > Specific Hardware > Graphics
Home Forums Rules All AlbumsBlogs Subscriptions Register Mark Forums Read

Graphics Covering everything from drivers to overclocking. If you need help with a Video Card, this is the place.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old July 24th, 2008   #1
Founder of Technical Arts
 
computer_freak_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 78
Post Quadro FX 4600 versus GeForce GTX 280?

I'm trying to figure out what the big deal with the Quadro FX series is.

At Nvidia Online Store - Product Information nVidia sells the Quadro FX 4600 for $2000.
However, nVidia links to NewEgg for sale of the GeForce GTX 280 Newegg.com - EVGA 01G-P3-1280-AR GeForce GTX 280 1GB 512-bit GDDR3 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready SLI Supported Video Card - Desktop Graphics / Video Cards for less that one-fourth of that price.


Here are the specs, though:

Quadro FX 4600:
768MB GDDR3
384-bit
67.2GBps

GeForce GTX 280:
1GB GDDR3
512-bit
141.7GBps


So, is it just me, or is the GeForce GTX 280 better for less than one-fourth the price? What am I missing?



There are 10 types of people in this world, those that understand binary and those that do not.
computer_freak_8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 24th, 2008   #2
Aeria gloris
 
azianai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 1,622
Default Re: Quadro FX 4600 versus GeForce GTX 280?

Quadro line is mainly for work stations, for people who are doing CAD and DCC as the geforce line is for us gamers.





Asus Rampage Formula
Q9450 @ 3.8 Ghz
Thermalright Ultra 120 Black Edition
4gb GSkill 1066 DDR2
1 WD Velociraptor 150GB
1 500GB Seagate 7200.10
2 1TB Seagate 7200.11
EVGA GTX260 Core 216
Silverstone ST85F
Coolermaster Cosmos 1000
Samsung TOC T240HD
azianai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 24th, 2008   #3
Modder-ator
 
gvblake22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tempe Desert
Posts: 6,480
Blog Entries: 1
Default Re: Quadro FX 4600 versus GeForce GTX 280?

What azianai said is exactly correct. The Quadro series cards are engineered (and marketed) for a totally different audience and use than the GeForce series. Quadro cards are really not meant to play games and will never perform well, so make sure you are looking at the GeForce cards if you are playing games. Kindof like the difference between the FireGL and Radeon cards from AMD/ATI.



gvblake22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 24th, 2008   #4
Colonel Calamity
 
screwballl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sandy South
Posts: 6,278
Blog Entries: 6
Default Re: Quadro FX 4600 versus GeForce GTX 280?

plenty of information from nvidia here:

http://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro_geforce.html

granted it is from 2003 but still applies







Thanks HL and Corsair!

My opinions are my own and not representative of this site or its members.


Last edited by screwballl; July 24th, 2008 at 12:56.
screwballl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 24th, 2008   #5
T-Rex
 
polobunny's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,101
Blog Entries: 6
Default Re: Quadro FX 4600 versus GeForce GTX 280?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gvblake22 View Post
What azianai said is exactly correct. The Quadro series cards are engineered (and marketed) for a totally different audience and use than the GeForce series. Quadro cards are really not meant to play games and will never perform well, so make sure you are looking at the GeForce cards if you are playing games. Kindof like the difference between the FireGL and Radeon cards from AMD/ATI.
That's not true at all. Quadro and GeForce are the same, except for the unlocked functions.
Quadro FX 4600 = GeForce 8800GTX
Using RivaTuner and a strap you can unlock certain cards to function like Quadro cards.



polobunny is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 24th, 2008   #6
Colonel Calamity
 
screwballl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sandy South
Posts: 6,278
Blog Entries: 6
Default Re: Quadro FX 4600 versus GeForce GTX 280?

the Quadro is for high detail/high resolution usage but sucks as a gaming card.. consumer based Geforce cards are for high performance fast calculations, but if you use it for workstation/CAD type duties, it will be slow.
2 completely different architectures, like Opteron and Athlon







Thanks HL and Corsair!

My opinions are my own and not representative of this site or its members.


Last edited by screwballl; July 24th, 2008 at 13:23.
screwballl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 24th, 2008   #7
Founder of Technical Arts
 
computer_freak_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 78
Default Re: Quadro FX 4600 versus GeForce GTX 280?

Okay, I guess I forgot to mention something.
I get the fact that one is for work and the other is for play.

But what is different about them? How do they each compensate for their intended use compared to the other? Is the 4x price difference justified?

I'm also not sure I understand CAD. I believe it stands for Computer Aided Drafting, but how is needing graphical power for that different from needing graphical power for an intense First-Person Shooter? If anything, I'd think you'd need more for the FPS...



There are 10 types of people in this world, those that understand binary and those that do not.
computer_freak_8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 24th, 2008   #8
oh noes
 
theburan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rapid City, SD (ish)
Posts: 973
Blog Entries: 3
Default Re: Quadro FX 4600 versus GeForce GTX 280?

I think alot of it boils down to the drivers and the stability... these work station cards are probably engineered so that once you install them, they will not break or crash during a calculation or something like that, no matter what, and also the drivers are probably written to focus on different things more important to cad/workstation type stuff.




e8500@4ghz|Asus P5k-e WiFi| 4gb OCZ ReaperX|2x 3870's|1.3tb storage space|MSI tv tuner.
theburan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 24th, 2008   #9
T-Rex
 
polobunny's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,101
Blog Entries: 6
Default Re: Quadro FX 4600 versus GeForce GTX 280?

Quote:
Originally Posted by computer_freak_8 View Post
Okay, I guess I forgot to mention something.
I get the fact that one is for work and the other is for play.

But what is different about them? How do they each compensate for their intended use compared to the other? Is the 4x price difference justified?

I'm also not sure I understand CAD. I believe it stands for Computer Aided Drafting, but how is needing graphical power for that different from needing graphical power for an intense First-Person Shooter? If anything, I'd think you'd need more for the FPS...
CAD is really different than a FPS, it's much more complex and uses specific functions.

Edit: theburan: There's nothing to them other than the fact they're detected as Quadros rather than GeForce. A simple BIOS flash won't fix this however, it's not so simple. That's why people mess with the drivers to make them believe they own a Quadro instead of a GeForce. It works relatively well, and you'll agree with me it's much cheaper so it's a somewhat great solution for CAD beginners which can't afford a Quadro or a Fire GL.




Last edited by polobunny; July 24th, 2008 at 15:08.
polobunny is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

  HardwareLogic > Specific Hardware > Graphics

Tags
4600, comparison, graphics card, quadro, versus


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quadro FX 4700X2 azianai Graphics 2 June 26th, 2008 05:00
Inspiron 4600 Lylan General Computing 16 January 12th, 2008 12:24
PC 4600 memory? coshkara Memory 9 August 2nd, 2007 12:53
Core 2 Quadro polobunny Processors 8 September 14th, 2006 11:47
6600gt vs Quadro FX 540 fps justin Graphics 6 August 4th, 2006 15:22


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 17:56.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
© HardwareLogic 2005 - 2008. All Rights Reserved


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52