![]() |
| |||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | All Albums | Blogs | Subscriptions | Register | Mark Forums Read |
| Graphics Covering everything from drivers to overclocking. If you need help with a Video Card, this is the place. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 |
| Avatar of Justice Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,135
| Here's how you can determine the memory need of a display, if you ever want to: If the max resolution is 1280 x 1024; and it can show 16,000,000 colors; the math is: Code: (1280*1024*32)/(8*1024) = min memory in MB needed Main PC: Intel Pentium D 930, Asus P5LP-LE, 2GB DDR2-4300 RAM @ 4-4-4-12, Lightscribe CD/DVD Drive, DVD-ROM, 300W PSU, GeForce 7300LE, Hauppauge WinTV PVR PCI II, HP Media Drive Port, 300 GB Hard Drive Laptop: 900 MHz Intel Moblie CPU, 512MB RAM, 4GB SSD, Intel 910 Motherboard, Linux OS (customized by Asus), 8.8 x 6.5 x 0.9 inches, 7.0 Inch screen, integrated camera, 2.0(without power cord)/2.4 lbs.(with power cord) _________________________________________ Last edited by gvblake22; October 19th, 2006 at 05:40. |
| |
| | #2 | |
| T-Rex | Yes I used this in the Quality vs Quantity ATI Radeon x1950XTX vs Geforce 7950GX2 thread. I also calculated anti aliasing and triple buffering, while at it. Here's my post: Quote:
| |
| |
| | #3 |
| Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 74
| What about ansiotrophic filtering? If this is true (8xAA requires 120MB of video RAM at 1280x1024) then how does Doom3 run great at Ultra Quality on 512MB 7900GTXs in SLI? I know that there are two of some of the best (note I did not say THE BEST) cards on the market, but if each level requires 500MB of memory and then 120MB is taken away, I don't have 640MB videocards here but my frames are silky smooth, even with 16xAA and 8xSAA + Ultra... |
| |
| | #4 |
| T-Rex | Anisotropic filtering does not multiply the number. =P Anti aliasing does, because it samples X times the number of pixels seen on the screen. 2X = 2 times more samples 4X = 4 times more samples etc etc I'm not quite sure how you ended with 640MB memory usage. =S |
| |
| | #5 |
| Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 74
| Because that's the next real size of videocard memory (supposadly 8800GTS). I hope I didn't imply that it uses that specific amount, because that's not what I meant. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| found, interesting, tidbit |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Kind of Interesting | drevsdre | HL Lounge | 2 | April 21st, 2008 06:19 |
| display issues | azianai | Troubleshooting | 0 | March 8th, 2008 23:40 |
| interesting anomoly | simple_inhibition | Overclocking | 3 | January 19th, 2008 16:03 |
| Why cant a TV display a still image? | Zambini | Peripherals | 10 | November 15th, 2006 21:57 |
| Interesting Web 2.0 | micmac | Internet/Networking | 6 | June 4th, 2006 18:30 |