HardwareLogic

Go Back   HardwareLogic > Specific Hardware > Motherboards
Home Forums Rules All AlbumsBlogs Subscriptions Register Mark Forums Read

Motherboards Get or give help selecting the best motherboard to build your system around.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old April 25th, 2006   #1
Official HL Legal Counsel
 
GV2NIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 136
Default Let's talk about Drive Strength

I've been trying to read up on this topic for the past few weeks, but I'm still not exactly sure what to think of it. I haven't changed my drive strength settings at all, and I don't seem to be running into any problems. However, I would like to open a discussion so that more of us can learn more about what it does, what risks it may present, and under what circumstances it should be manipulated.

I know it applies mostly to those of us using TCCD. Some people have gotten better results by upping their drive strength and/or data drive strength. I would like to know more about it, and I think others would too. I want to leave the topic open to discuss all of the other mysterious RAM timings on DFI boards aside from the usual Tcl, Trcd, Tras, and Trp. DFI-Street is too extensive, I think we should have our own guide here! :)

So, that's that. Fire away! I'll keep posing as I learn more. Thanks guys!



CPU: Opteron 170 @ 2.70GHz (270x10) Vcore=1.425V
Mobo: DFI Lanparty UT nF4 SLI-DR Expert
RAM: 2x 512 OCZ PC-4800 EL Elite CL2.5-4-4-10 2T (1:1)
Video: ATi Radeon X1900XT
PSU: FSP Group FX700-GLN 700W

My Heatware
GV2NIX is offline  
Old April 25th, 2006   #2
Modder-ator
 
gvblake22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tempe Desert
Posts: 6,421
Blog Entries: 1
Default

I heard the Tref has some signifigant impact on overclockability with TCCD/TCC5 based RAM...
Other than that, I'm about as baffled on all DFI's RAM timings as you are
I printed off a total of like 30 pages of information just on RAM and BIOS settings from DFI-Street, but it's a lot to wade through...

I found THIS thread to be the most informational though.
Quote:
DRAM Drive Strength

Settings = Auto, 1-8 in 1.0 increments.

Paraphrased From Adrian Wong’s site:http://www.rojakpot.com/ “Sometimes called driving strength. This feature allows you to control the memory data bus' signal strength. Increasing the drive strength of the memory bus can increase stability during overclocking. DRAM drive strength refers to the signal strength of the memory data line. A higher number means a stronger signal and is generally recommended for an overclocked module to improve stability. Supposedly TCCD works better with weak drive strength while just about everything else prefers a stronger signal.”

From bigtoe: “If you leave the option at Auto this will set a weak drive strength, this is good for TCCD based modules but bad for anything else. From testing and debugging the board I have concluded the following. Options 1 3 5 7 are all weak, as is Auto, setting. 1 is actually the weakest option with 7 being as close to the normal weak setting DFI will allow us. Options 2 4 6 8 are the Normal settings, with 8 being the highest strength setting. If you are using TCCD you may want to try 3 5 or 7 as the drive settings as they usually seem to allow the modules to clock well. If you are using VX, or the new BH Gold, or any other modules from the OCZ range you may want to try 8 or 6.”

Large Influence on Stability.

Suggested Settings for DFI: From bigtoe: “If you are using TCCD you may want to try 3 5 or 7 as the drive settings as they usually seem to allow the modules to clock well. If you are using VX, or the new BH Gold, or any other modules from the OCZ range you may want to try 8 or 6.”


DRAM Data Drive Strength

Settings = Levels 1-4 in 1.0 increments.

From Adrian Wong’s site: http://www.rojakpot.com/
"The MD Driving Strength determines the signal strength of the memory data line. The higher the value, the stronger the signal. It is mainly used to boost the DRAM driving capability with heavier DRAM loads (multiple and/or double-sided DIMMs). So, if you are using a heavy DRAM load, you should set this function to Hi or High. Due to the nature of this BIOS option, it's possible to use it as an aid in overclocking the memory bus. Your SDRAM DIMM may not overclock as well as you wanted it to. But by raising the signal strength of the memory data line, it is possible to improve its stability at overclocked speeds. But this is not a surefire way of overclocking the memory bus. In addition, increasing the memory bus signal strength will not improve the performance of the SDRAM DIMMs. So, it's advisable to leave the MD Driving Strength at Lo/Low unless you have a high DRAM load or if you are trying to stabilize an overclocked DIMM."

Large Influence on Stability.

Suggested Settings for DFI: Many have suggested using Level 1 or 3, if you have CPC enabled. With CPC, anything above level 1 gives some users extreme instability. Some users like level 3 with CPC enabled. Some others have had success with using level 2-4 if CPC is disabled. I had good luck with CPC enabled and Level 4. (Higher = Faster)



gvblake22 is online now  
Old April 26th, 2006   #3
Official HL Legal Counsel
 
GV2NIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 136
Default

Hey blake, sorry for not posting sooner, but I've been going nuts here being it's my final week!

Anyways, that's a great resource! It sheds some light on the topic. I was curious, when he talks about "heavy DRAM load" he seems to be saying that multi/double-sided DIMMs are considered "heavy DRAM loads"

Quote:
So, it's advisable to leave the MD Driving Strength at Lo/Low unless you have a high DRAM load or if you are trying to stabilize an overclocked DIMM.
So, by this logic, anyone with double-sided DIMMs should benefit from a higher data drive strength?



CPU: Opteron 170 @ 2.70GHz (270x10) Vcore=1.425V
Mobo: DFI Lanparty UT nF4 SLI-DR Expert
RAM: 2x 512 OCZ PC-4800 EL Elite CL2.5-4-4-10 2T (1:1)
Video: ATi Radeon X1900XT
PSU: FSP Group FX700-GLN 700W

My Heatware
GV2NIX is offline  
Old April 26th, 2006   #4
Modder-ator
 
gvblake22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tempe Desert
Posts: 6,421
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GV2NIX
So, by this logic, anyone with double-sided DIMMs should benefit from a higher data drive strength?
From the description, it does seem that way :?



gvblake22 is online now  
Old April 26th, 2006   #5
Official HL Legal Counsel
 
GV2NIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 136
Default

Well, I guess that takes care of drive strength and data drive strength. I can't imagine finding anything more informative than the stuff you posted, thanks! :)

Ok next. We all pretty much know how the blue items work. Although I'm sure we won't get through all of them, I would like to hear thoughts. Hopefully we can shed some light on these mysteries!


Ram Multi
CPC
Tcl
Trcd
Tras
Trp


Trc
Trfc
Trrd
Twr
Twtr
Trwt
Tref
Twcl
Bank Interleve
Dynamic Skew Control
Skew Value
Max Async
Read Preamble
Idle Cycle
Dynamic Counter
R/W Que Bypass
Bypass MAX
32 Bit Gran



CPU: Opteron 170 @ 2.70GHz (270x10) Vcore=1.425V
Mobo: DFI Lanparty UT nF4 SLI-DR Expert
RAM: 2x 512 OCZ PC-4800 EL Elite CL2.5-4-4-10 2T (1:1)
Video: ATi Radeon X1900XT
PSU: FSP Group FX700-GLN 700W

My Heatware
GV2NIX is offline  
Closed Thread

  HardwareLogic > Specific Hardware > Motherboards

Tags
drive, strength, talk


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Talk about making a transparent LCD screen an art Quakindude HL Lounge 4 November 25th, 2007 19:50
Crucial's "Talk Like a Pirate Day" Contest Capper HL Lounge 21 September 19th, 2007 12:42
Gigabyte's Tech Talk 2007 Part I Capper General Computing 6 July 25th, 2007 09:01
X-Drive Gig-O-Ram Software & OSs 5 March 27th, 2007 20:34
DDR regains strength as Intel 865 revives Capper Memory 3 April 4th, 2006 07:15


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 13:18.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
HardwareLogic 2005 - 2008. All Rights Reserved


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49