HardwareLogic

Go Back   HardwareLogic > Specific Hardware > Processors
Home Forums Rules All AlbumsBlogs Donate Subscriptions Register Mark Forums Read vBExperience

Processors Need help picking the right processor? Need help getting the most out of a processor you already have?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old July 18th, 2007   #1
weeeeeeeeeee
Points: 1,107, Level: 1
Points: 1,107, Level: 1 Points: 1,107, Level: 1 Points: 1,107, Level: 1
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 44
Default Hyperthreaded or not?

alright so there i am looking at AMD and Intel processors. i'm reading on newegg.com at Intel processors and under specifications it says that this processor does not support hyper-threading..... well i thought the whole big thing about these processors what that they were hyperthreaded. but right now most of the games and applications aren't hyperthreaded. but if it says they aren't hyperthreaded..... then wtf? help me out i'm confused..
Finrir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 18th, 2007   #2
I don't know how to put this, but, I'm kind of a big deal.
Points: 12,693, Level: 73
Points: 12,693, Level: 73 Points: 12,693, Level: 73 Points: 12,693, Level: 73
Activity: 33%
Activity: 33% Activity: 33% Activity: 33%
 
One4yu2c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Land of the Lounge Lizards
Posts: 2,477
Blog Entries: 3
Default Re: Hyperthreaded or not?

HyperThreading is an Intel technology where, in short, one processor core can work on two different processing units at the same time, thereby simulating a dual-core or dual-CPU system. It's just not as efficient, and you're still dealing with one physical processor. To use a simplistic analogy, it'd be like painting a house with two hands, instead of using one hand while your other one sits idle.

AMD's X2 and Intel's Core 2 line of processors are dual-core chips, which means that there are two physical processors on a single die. The term I think you were looking for is mulit-threaded, and when developers code their applications to be multi-threaded, dual and quad-core processors are essentially able to process tasks twice (or four times) as fast a single core processor. To use the same analogy as above, it's now like having two (or four) people paint a house, as opposed to one.

And here's where things get interesting. Dual-core CPUs are just now starting to become mainstream, so up until this point, developers haven't put a ton of concentration into multi-threaded coding. The situation is improving though, and even regardless of the second (or third and fourth) cores, today's processors (like the Core 2 Duo) sport other architectural enhancements that help them outperform yesterday's single-core processors at any given clockspeed.



One4yu2c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 11th, 2007   #3
Points: 768, Level: 1
Points: 768, Level: 1 Points: 768, Level: 1 Points: 768, Level: 1
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 21
Default Re: Hyperthreaded or not?

Hyperthreading was nothing but a way to exploit the super long pipeline of the Netburst architecture. Basically, a way to make it seem not so bad.

They better not come out with another processor that supports Hyperthreading.



Some $30 case from tigerdirect
DFI LANPARTY UT nF4 Ultra-D
2x512mb of Patriot DDR400, XBL+K (TCCD + Brainpower--DDR-600+ at 2.5-3-3-7-1T!)
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ CCBWE 0531XPMW (avoid this stepping)
eVGA 7900GT KO
NEC 3550a DVD-RW
WD2500JS (250gb, SATA 3.0GB/s, 8mb cache)
WD3200AAKS (320gb, SATA 3.0GB/s, 16mb cache, NCQ!)
dnorf87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 11th, 2007   #4
Points: 13,323, Level: 75
Points: 13,323, Level: 75 Points: 13,323, Level: 75 Points: 13,323, Level: 75
Activity: 23%
Activity: 23% Activity: 23% Activity: 23%
 
Yellowhello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pacific Grove, CA
Posts: 4,178
Default Re: Hyperthreaded or not?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dnorf87 View Post
Hyperthreading was nothing but a way to exploit the super long pipeline of the Netburst architecture. Basically, a way to make it seem not so bad.

They better not come out with another processor that supports Hyperthreading.
I heard that Intel made a quad core with hyperthreading that made it seem like a eight-core CPU. Don't know if it's true, just a rumor I heard.



Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 + Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme
DFI Blood Iron P35-T2RL + Thermalright HR-05 IFX
2GB G.Skill 800MHz F2-6400PHU2-2GBHZ
EVGA GeForce 8800GTS 320MB
Silverstone Decathlon 650W
Western Digital 250GB SATA II

Yellowhello is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

  HardwareLogic > Specific Hardware > Processors


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 13:13.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
© HardwareLogic 2005 - 2008. All Rights Reserved


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45