AMD, We Need Thee!
Posted December 8th, 2007 at 06:07 by One4yu2c

But AMD's bleak outlook isn't what I want to focus on today, and quite frankly, I'm getting tired of blogging and posting in forums on this topic. Instead, let's look at what an AMD-less world would look like, with tongue firmly in cheek. Hey, why not laugh about it today, and save the crying for tomorrow?
The Never Ending Pipeline and BTX Debacle
Perhaps AMD's greatest contribution to the enthusiast community was pushing Intel away from the crazy long pipelines inherent in Netburst. The Pentium 4 doubled the instruction pipeline found in the Pentium 3 from 10 to 20 stages, which resulted in bigger performance penalties for branch mis-predictions. But it didn't reach comical status until the Prescott debuted. Along with increasing the pipeline even further to 31 stages, the first revision Prescotts also turned on the heat. Literally. It produced so much heat, in fact, that Intel went and designed a new formfactor, BTX, to keep systems from melting into a pile of ATX goo. Without AMD stepping in with a more efficient and cool running architecture, my fuzzy math has today's Netburst based Pentium processors sporting no less than 473.8 stage pipelines and running at 38GHz, and still slower than today's Core 2 processors, which incidentally would never have existed. But wait, it gets worse! BTX still goes the way of the dodo, but not for lack of interest, and instead because it's been rendered ineffective. In its place is RTX (Refrigeration Technology Extended), utilizing refrigeration technology to keep those chips cool. On the positive side, higher end RTX cases are capable of housing your favorite carbonated or alcoholic beverages.The x64 Revolution
The Athlon 64 (A64) popularized 64-bit computing, and without AMD, today the vast majority of system builders still opt for 32-bit OSes. Oh wait...ATI and nVidia Duke it Out
Chipset Choices
Free will or determinism? That's a hot topic in the world of philosophy, and while the aged debate rages on, enthusiasts already have their answer: Determinism. Want to run two nVidia videocards in SLI? Then you need an nVidia chipset, such as the 680i. Infatuated with ATI, er, AMD/ATI's GPUs and wish to take advantage of Crossfire? Then it's an Intel chipset for you! See how simple that is? But in an Intel-only society, simplicity gets thrown out the window in favor of choices, hearkening back to the days when you still had to pick out a chipset after already settling on a GPU, or vice versa! How unnecessarily complicated.Final Analysis
These are just some of the scenarios we'd face in an AMD-less world, and tongue-in-cheek as they may be, we all really should be pulling for the green team to jump back into the limelight. With Intel's Penryn refresh on the way and Nehalem to follow not long after, AMD's finally fighting an opponent that's trying (successfully so far) to best them at their own efficiency game. And before you think that a major player in largely a two man fight won't ever be knocked down for the count, one need only look back at 3DFX and AdLib as two very real examples that point to the contrary. My plea to AMD is this: If you've got an Ace up your sleeve, then use it! A world without you just isn't the same, baby...
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49
Total Comments 1
Comments
| | I agree completely. AMD must survive and be competitive. If Intel can get a major foothold it will do what almost any other company would do: start leveraging the prices up as high as possible. Don't get me wrong, I have a Q6600 and an Intel motherboard; I just remember the tactics Intel has used in the past ;). |
Posted 4 Weeks Ago at 19:15 by linuxcrazy |
Recent Blog Entries by One4yu2c
- Shopping Polygamously (February 26th, 2008)
- Website Reviews and You: Part 1 (December 8th, 2007)
- AMD, We Need Thee! (December 8th, 2007)












