![]() |
| | #51 | |
| BAM-BAM | Quote:
![]() -1 Last edited by onebxr; May 30th, 2008 at 07:00. | |
| | |
| | #52 |
| Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,002
| I'm pretty sure no nuclear plants have been licensed in the US since the Three Mile Island bit. Are you sure they're building nuclear power plants in the US? And where are the refineries being built? ![]() |
| | |
| | #53 |
| BAM-BAM | |
| | |
| | #54 |
| Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,002
| Yeah - after I posted I went to Wiki too and saw that too. I think, though, that it is one thing for the Department of Energy to solicit applications for licensing but completely another thing to get past all the NIMBYs to actually get the thing up and running. I spent enough time in Missouri to adopt their famed "show me" attitude - I'll believe it when I see it. ![]() |
| | |
| | #55 |
| 4GHz or Bust Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: A different kind of Green Computing
Posts: 2,115
| Nuclear power can save us until we can perfect fusion! ![]() |
| | |
| | #56 | |
| BAM-BAM | Quote:
-1 | |
| | |
| | #57 |
| Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,002
| OK - it is dated but the important reference point is the "no new refineries in the US in the past 29 years". That was as of three years ago. CorpWatch*:*US: No New Refineries in 29 Years ![]() |
| | |
| | #58 |
| Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,002
| And the other side of the coin from exactly one year ago... ConocoPhillips executive says Congressional plans stall new U.S. refineries - Cleveland Business News – The Latest Breaking News, Earnings Reports and Stories from The Plain Dealer Appears there have been no new refineries built here for so long partly because of environmental/regulatory red tape (perceived or actual isn't clear) but also partly because of no need (until Katrina) to build new ones, as existing ones were running at about 85% capacity (at least at Conoco in early 2007). I wonder what the oil execs are doing/saying these days about new refineries? Incidentally note - June 2007 court case where judge ruled the first new rifinery in 30 years - as noted in an earlier post - could proceed on Indian land in AZ. So two years after announcing plans to build a new refinery (in May 2005) a court case was settled saying plans could proceed. I take a couple things from this (admittedly) incomplete research - officially it may be very easy to build a new refinery, but on a practical basis you're talking years and years of effort to plan and build in the face of often hostile NIMBYs. That's a LONG time frame for any company to consider. Also, until recently at least, there wasn't any need for new refineries due to spare capacity. Any "spare" capacity seems gone, but the fact, I suspect, is that the public's willingness to accept new refineries (which you might infer from a LACK of lawsuits about them) is still very strong. ![]() |
| | |
| | #59 |
| BAM-BAM | Alot of what is being done now is the refitting and reworking of old refineries to make them more efficient. This is more cost/time effecient than haggling with the tree huggers. -1 |
| | |
| | #60 |
| Colonel Calamity | Good points across the board... and I knew about the no new refineries situation... what we need is at least 4-5 new refineries AND to start drilling locally to reduce our foreign dependence.... that or just create the magnetic motor so no fuel is needed at all. ![]() Thanks HL and Corsair! My opinions are my own and not representative of this site or its members. |
| | |