![]() |
| |||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | All Albums | Blogs | Subscriptions | Register | Mark Forums Read |
| General Computing Need help with recommendations? Want to discuss general technology issues? This is the place. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #21 |
| 4GHz or Bust Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: A different kind of Green Computing
Posts: 2,179
| I wouldn't worry, it should be fine. Whichever card you choose I think you'll be happy. ![]() |
| | |
| | #22 |
| We take both criticism and positive comments very positively | We'll be posting our review of the Palit HD 4870 next week......excellent video card INTEL QX9650 // Gigabyte EP45 Extreme // 8GB PC2-8500 // BFG GTX260 MaxCore // DD Torture Rack // Seagate 750GB HDD // OCZ Vendetta // PC Power & Cooling 620W PSU |
| | |
| | #24 |
| 4GHz or Bust Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: A different kind of Green Computing
Posts: 2,179
| The E8400 is a great chip. However if you are trying to save some money, and you're willing to overclock I'd still go with the 7200. At the same clock speeds there will be virtually no difference in gaming performance between the E8400 and E7200. Even at stock clocks the E7200 is still pretty fast, and would have no problem keeping up with the 8 series chips in gaming. Whichever you choose I know you'll be happy! ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by drew and not u; October 6th, 2008 at 09:04. |
| | |
| | #25 |
| The Boss Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 93
| my concern is that i don't think i will be overclocking mainly because i don't want it to DIE on me and become too hot or all that hype...also, wouldn't i need an aftermarket heatsink??? but then again if i decide to overclock, would this chip be able to just reach speeds equivalent to the e8400 without worrying about it dying out on me??? and what about the cache differences??? would that play a roll also, the PSU i chose...what is the difference between that one and the one you preffered earlier in the post (OCZ)??? (besides the watts) Last edited by edbtzy; October 6th, 2008 at 10:10. |
| | |
| | #26 | ||
| Photogenic | Quote:
![]() And I might look into an aftermarket cooler, but that depends. The overclock from 2.53Ghz (E7200 stock) to 3.0Ghz will hardly increase heat, and you shouldn't (I'd say, won't) need to even touch the voltage... But it's up to you. Quote:
I have the 650w myself, excellent PSU, and VERY quiet, but has all the connections I'll ever need. Well built to, I might add. ![]() Also, why only 2GB of RAM?? | ||
| | |
| | #27 |
| The Boss Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 93
| because when my friend installed his 4gb, the computer only read 3.25 and i figured that i could always buy another 2 gb down the road whenever i wanted to... the hardest decision is choosing the CPU...im trying to save money but at the same time i don't want to lose a lot of performance (3 vs 6mb cache) im also trying to stay future proof ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| | |
| | #28 | ||
| Photogenic | Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() | ||
| | |
| | #29 |
| 4GHz or Bust Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: A different kind of Green Computing
Posts: 2,179
| Haha, I know how you feel. If money wasn't an issue I'd say just go the E8400 route. As far as the E7200 goes, you can easily overclock it past 3.0GHz with minimal (if any) voltage bump, and definitely without even nearing Intel's maximum recommended voltage, and using the stock cooler. With an aftermarket cooler, you could take it as far as 3.6 or 3.8 without doing anything more than bumping the cpu and NB voltage. The reason the E7200 and E8400 will clock about the same is they both use the same core, the E7200 just has a lower FSB and slightly higher (.5) multiplier. So by overclocking it to 3GHz (for example), you're essentially just turning it back into an E8400, minus the extra cache. I totally understand your dilemma, and as far as the cache is concerned, the difference between 3 and 6 will be very minimal, and you'll only notice it in slightly reduced benchmark scores. I know it it sounds bad, because it has half the cache, but the cache has only a small impact in performance. Just check my sign, I have machines running both these chips, and I honestly can't tell the difference. To summarize, by going with the E7200 you'll be saving that extra money, achieving nearly the same performance, and learning a lot about your computer through overclocking. ![]() |
| | |
| | #30 |
| The Boss Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 93
| thanks for the clarification...i think i just might go with the E7200 because i wont be gaming like CRAZYYYY but i would love to have the option (aka COD4/crysis and other games comming out) as for overclocking, is there a LEGIT and USEFUL guide to overclocking this setup??? something you guys may recommend |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| upgrading |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Upgrading to Vista OS | Django | Software & OSs | 17 | April 8th, 2008 21:37 |
| Thinking of upgrading | insomnia | General Computing | 4 | January 30th, 2008 09:27 |
| Building/Upgrading this system | Ikean | General Computing | 11 | December 29th, 2007 22:19 |
| worried about upgrading | qazwsx | Software & OSs | 13 | July 30th, 2007 05:30 |
| Upgrading. Need help! | Elysium | General Computing | 21 | March 18th, 2007 17:58 |