HardwareLogic

Go Back   HardwareLogic > General Discussions > User Guides/Reviews
Home Forums Rules All AlbumsBlogs Subscriptions Register Mark Forums Read

User Guides/Reviews Want to be a published writer? Want to praise or flame something you just bought? We want to know what you think.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old May 14th, 2006   #11
Functional Alcoholic
 
Hitman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 14S E:561116 N:3830189
Posts: 4,248
Blog Entries: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gvblake22
Cool. What do you think of RAID 1? I'm about ready to buy another 250GB drive to put in RAID 1 for backups/mass storage. I guess I'm just a little put off by setting it up and the possibility of rebuilding it in case of a failure. Mostly just because I've never done a RAID setup before...

Also, would you recommend RAID 5 over a single Raptor and two 7200rpm RAID 1 drives?
What I don't like about RAID 1 is that you loose one Drive to Redundancy. There are situations where this is necessary, but not in my situation. What I like about RAID 5 is that it has less overhead, but it does require at least 3 Hard Drives.

I suggest using a Raptor for your OS. As far as what RAID level to use for your Data drives, that really up to you. If you have more then 3 HD's I would go with RAID 5, but if you only have 2 your limited.




Hitman is offline  
Old May 14th, 2006   #12
Modder-ator
 
gvblake22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tempe Desert
Posts: 6,356
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Yeah, my current setup includes a 74GB raptor for OS and programs/games and a 250GB seagate 7200.8 for backups and mass storage. It works well, but I am getting tired of manually backing stuff up on the 250GB drive and thought that getting another for RAID 1 would be nice because I wouldn't have to worry about backing stuff up manually anymore. I have also thought about just ditching the Raptor all together and just using a RAID 1 setup with two large capacity drives.



gvblake22 is offline  
Old May 14th, 2006   #13
Functional Alcoholic
 
Hitman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 14S E:561116 N:3830189
Posts: 4,248
Blog Entries: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gvblake22
Yeah, my current setup includes a 74GB raptor for OS and programs/games and a 250GB seagate 7200.8 for backups and mass storage. It works well, but I am getting tired of manually backing stuff up on the 250GB drive and thought that getting another for RAID 1 would be nice because I wouldn't have to worry about backing stuff up manually anymore. I have also thought about just ditching the Raptor all together and just using a RAID 1 setup with two large capacity drives.
RAID 1 is not a replacement for Backup!!!!! There is a difference between Redundancy and Backing Up. Redundancy, is for immediate recovery from Drive Failure. A backup is for restoring Data in case of loss. For example, you accidentally Delete your Picture folder, and it was too big to fit into the Recycle bin, so its GONE. If you have your important files backed up on a External Drive, or on DVD all is not lost. Once its deleted from a drive in a RAID 1 array then its just gone. If your talking about RAID 1 on your backup drive, then thats OK. I backup to an external drive, and keep it in a Fire Proof Box in case of a disaster. All my photos are kept on DVD inside the same fire proof Box.

As far as ditching your Raptor for a RAID 1 array, you will see a major performance drop. I suggest keeping the Raptor, and use RAID 1 as Data Storage.




Hitman is offline  
Old May 14th, 2006   #14
Modder-ator
 
gvblake22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tempe Desert
Posts: 6,356
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Ok, yeah, I guess I should have chosen my words a little better. I still burn CD's for permanent backups, but that is much less frequent. I mostly just want the security of having a complete copy of all my data on another HDD so if one fails, I can use the other to restore stuff or make a permanent backup on optical media or something and then rebuild the RAID setup. I guess I still have a lot of options to weigh :?



gvblake22 is offline  
Old May 14th, 2006   #15
I'm Evil
 
Capper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 5,665
Blog Entries: 6
Default

Outstanding HITMAN, thnaks for the quick guide.....we've had a lot of questions about RAID and its benefits and this is a huge help to some members considering the option.



INTEL QX9650
ASUS P5E3 Premium
4GB DDR3-1600
Sapphire HD 3870X2
Danger Den Tower-26 (Custom W/C)
5 x Seagate 250GB HDD in RAID5
BFG ES 800W PSU
Capper is offline  
Old May 14th, 2006   #16
Functional Alcoholic
 
Hitman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 14S E:561116 N:3830189
Posts: 4,248
Blog Entries: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Capper
Outstanding HITMAN, thnaks for the quick guide.....we've had a lot of questions about RAID and its benefits and this is a huge help to some members considering the option.
RAID has become very popular as of late, due to SATA, Raptors, and onboard RAID Controllers, and the growing popularity of having more then one HD in your system for DATA. I think its very important that people understand the advantages and disadvantages of each RAID Level. All a lot of people know about are RAID 0 and RAID 1. With MB's now offering Onboard RAID 5 and other RAID Levels people now have more options then before, without having to buy an add on PCI RAID Controller.




Hitman is offline  
Old May 14th, 2006   #17
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Rhode Island USA
Posts: 1,716
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitman
Quote:
Originally Posted by Capper
Outstanding HITMAN, thnaks for the quick guide.....we've had a lot of questions about RAID and its benefits and this is a huge help to some members considering the option.
RAID has become very popular as of late, due to SATA, Raptors, and onboard RAID Controllers, and the growing popularity of having more then one HD in your system for DATA. I think its very important that people understand the advantages and disadvantages of each RAID Level. All a lot of people know about are RAID 0 and RAID 1. With MB's now offering Onboard RAID 5 and other RAID Levels people now have more options then before, without having to buy an add on PCI RAID Controller.
But onboard raid controllers cant compete witht the $300+ Pro raid controllers, correct?
Lead Head is offline  
Old May 14th, 2006   #18
Functional Alcoholic
 
Hitman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 14S E:561116 N:3830189
Posts: 4,248
Blog Entries: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lead Head
But onboard raid controllers cant compete witht the $300+ Pro raid controllers, correct?
Pro RAID Controllers, typically have Memory on the card itself. Depending on which card you buy, they have different RAID Levels that are not available on an Onboard RAID controller. For most home users the Onboard RAID is sufficient. If your running a server a RAID Controller add on card might be necessary.




Hitman is offline  
Closed Thread

  HardwareLogic > General Discussions > User Guides/Reviews

Tags
guide, raid


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
To RAID or not to RAID jgalt92 General Computing 4 March 29th, 2008 10:13
Raid set-up Badluck Inc General Computing 6 February 15th, 2008 01:22
4 HD in Raid? Nikolai Peripherals 4 August 18th, 2007 20:35
What's with RAID? hackman2007 Peripherals 10 December 19th, 2006 19:21
Should I Go RAID-0? jph1589 Peripherals 34 October 27th, 2006 21:29


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:41.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
© HardwareLogic 2005 - 2008. All Rights Reserved


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49