![]() |
| |||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | All Albums | Blogs | Subscriptions | Register | Mark Forums Read |
| Cooling From air to extreme, all your cooling questions and issues are addressed here. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack (25) | Thread Tools |
| | #61 |
| socket 939 junkie | ok so here my results. AS5 Idle ![]() Core Temp Readings: core 0: 34c. core 1: 33c Easy Tune 5 Pro: 21c AS5 Load ![]() Core Temp Readings: core 0: 44c. core 1: 42c Easy Tune 5 Pro: 32c IC7 Idle ![]() Core Temp Readings: core 0: 33c. core 1: 28c Easy Tune 5 Pro: 18c IC7 Load ![]() Core Temp Readings: core 0: 42c. core 1: 39c Easy Tune 5 Pro: 27c with this E8400, im more inclined to believe Easy Tune 5 Pro's temps over Core Temp. reason being is when im in the bios, the idle temp is only 3c higher than what Easy Tune 5 Pro reads. also couple that with my cooling (see sig) AS5 Idle: 34/33 | 21 Load: 44/42 | 32 IC7 Idle: 33/28 | 18 Load: 42/39 | 27 that translates into a 3c difference at idle and a 5c difference at load. very impressive results! the only con i would have to say is its slightly scary applying a pea sized amount of TIM when your used to a BB or rice grain sized amount of TIM. overall this is great stuff and im definitely hooked! Q6600 @ 3.6ghz (400x9 @ 1.408v) Gigabyte X38-DQ6 2x2GB G-Skill DDR2 1000 @ DDR2 1066 5-5-5-15 2T 2.1v Visiontek HD4870 Seagate 7200.11 500GB 32MB Cache HDD Razer Barracuda AC1 Silverstone DA750 Samsung Dual Layer DVD Burner Lian Li G70WB Thermochill PA120.3|Swiftech Storm Rev.2|Swiftech MCP 655 |
| | |
| | #62 |
| Colonel Calamity | I didn't get a chance to get any screenshots but: E6600 @ stock 2.4GHz, 80ºF room temp Tested on GA-965P-DS3 with Big Typhoon cooler temps verified today on a GA-EP35-DS3P mobo as well AS5: idle 34ºC load 50ºC IC7: idle 29ºC load 41ºC at first I was confused by the different temp readings but I redid it several times over the past few days and these are pretty much the average +/-2ºC ![]() Thanks HL and Corsair! My opinions are my own and not representative of this site or its members. |
| | |
| | #64 |
| Colonel Calamity | one thing that I noticed after running it hard with AS5 is this: ![]() Notice the "trails" right in the center? This happened with AS5 quite often after running it hard. Yet IC7 stayed just as thick and untouched as before... I am convinced!! ![]() Thanks HL and Corsair! My opinions are my own and not representative of this site or its members. Last edited by screwballl; February 29th, 2008 at 20:23. |
| | |
| | #65 | |
| Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 124
| Quote: I get that from my close ups, hard to tell from the picture what's pixelated, I see kind of of a citymap kind of thing and a light brown river delta with fingers lower right center. which are you referring to? Also are those bubbles on the top and bottom edges or just reflections of the light? How did the heat sink base look? How old was the install with the baseline grease? Last edited by IC Diamond 7; March 1st, 2008 at 12:41. | |
| | |
| | #66 |
| Colonel Calamity | info in PM to keep the rep from getting in trouble ![]() ![]() Thanks HL and Corsair! My opinions are my own and not representative of this site or its members. |
| | |
| | #67 |
| resident headbanger | I used this on my home computer which is an AMD 939 4400x2. Using my motherboards' monitoring suite, uguru, I got these temperatures: AS5 idle- 31 load - 49 IC7 idle - 27 load - 44 I am getting an average of a 5 degree change, not too shabby. The only thing about this stuff is you have to put on quite a bit of it to cover the processor. Other than that a 10 minute job. Well done IC7. -1 I would rather read a NewEgg review than a [H] review |
| | |
| | #68 |
| Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 124
| Performance tip I do not know why I did not post this before. http://download.intel.com/design/Pen...s/30255304.pdf It has a discussion of heat sink pressure loads on an Intel stock solution sink. Some of the loads discussed pg 51 43 lbs. +/ 10lbs So referencing back to the ICD7 chart pressure vs thermal resistance Innovation Cooling Lightly loaded sinks will affect performance significantly and not just for ICD7 also on tests I have done on competitive greases Good stuff to browse for key points. Intel says to cover the entire IHS with TIM. Designs should compensate for retention bracket fatigue. That the IHS gets flatter with more pressure etc. Last edited by IC Diamond 7; March 5th, 2008 at 16:43. Reason: added info |
| | |
| | #69 |
| Colonel Calamity | Maybe thats why a few C2D I have dealt with have had concave or bowl shaped IHS... this current E6600 had it slightly but has not been a problem since I can get proper pressure with the Tt Big Typhoon, but that Scythe Ninja was just horrible... had to tighten those plastic clips almost once a month or I would see 50ºC+ with partial load. ![]() Thanks HL and Corsair! My opinions are my own and not representative of this site or its members. |
| | |
| | #70 |
| Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 124
| Makes sense as a valuable point to add to the checklist when troubleshooting temps as a non obvious point. Also as key criteria when selecting a heat sink |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| icd, icd7, results, thermal compound, thread |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Any Q9450 OC results yet? | Tech Geek Deluxe | Overclocking | 16 | April 7th, 2008 21:02 |
| AVG results | oldman_gamer | Troubleshooting | 6 | February 28th, 2008 14:47 |
| 3DMark 05 Results Right? | XoRn | General Computing | 0 | April 22nd, 2007 20:27 |
| 7950 GT OC results | nhobo | Graphics | 0 | December 29th, 2006 12:14 |
| Anomalous PC Mark Results | drew and not u | Troubleshooting | 9 | October 17th, 2006 18:31 |