![]() |
| |||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | All Albums | Blogs | Subscriptions | Register | Mark Forums Read |
| Cooling From air to extreme, all your cooling questions and issues are addressed here. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack (30) | Thread Tools |
| | #151 |
| Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 143
| this is the hardwarelogic list of pressure film testers. If I have missed anybody let me know. stinger608 theburan RAID Yellowhello polobunny simple_inhibition gvblake22 I had my Telecon with the pressure film rep. He Recommends the test be done dry, basically what we are looking for are mechanical inconsistencies and by filling in the voids it tends to obscure the contact issues. Relative humidity is not a problem and can be ignored for our tests. Room temperature should be noted. CPU should be room temp A careful clamping sequence should be adequate. 10 - 15 min exposure for the film should work fine - Once you reach max exposure/pressure the film stops further rupturing of the color nodules. as long as exposure is not more than 24hours nothing else has to be noted Question. IHS sample cut size, I am looking at around 1.2 inches square per sample or maybe 1.5 in. to make it easier to get a full print. I do not want to go too much larger as I would like to send as many test samples as I can to each participant. Will 1.5 Inch square do it for you guys? We will do the full color mapping analysis on each one. It will take me a day or so to get organized on mailing,tracking results method so samples will probably go out Friday. Added what we will get from the analysis With the Topaq® Advanced Pressure Analysis System, statistical data and detailed digital visuals can be extracted from Pressurex® pressure indicating sensor films. Topaq® enables a wealth of statistical information and high resolution visuals to be extracted from Pressurex® - greatly enhancing the ability of the sensor film to define pressure distribution and magnitude. Vital statistics like total force, average pressure, total square inches of contact and standard deviation can be determined with ±4% accuracy using Topaq®’s advanced analysis capabilities. Topaq® can also render histogramic and population statistics on user-defined regions of interest. Features • 2D pseudocolor display of pressure distribution • 3D topographical view • Graphical display of pressure data • Graphical view of data along a user-defined line • Detailed pressure statistics I have a total of 27 from Anandtech, hardwarelogic, overclockers.com and xtremesystems with the multiples probably hit 50 to 60 covering a full range of systems, coolers. A pretty good sample in my book. I'll do a scan of the raw result noting the sink and setup before I send it out for a comparison to the pressure mapped analysis Last edited by IC Diamond 7; April 16th, 2008 at 16:57. |
| | |
| | #152 |
| Silence..Or I kill you! | Awesome!!! This will be a great test, with many different brands of not only coolers, but chips, and mother boards as well!!! When we send the samples back, and you may want to request this from the other participating sites, we should include: Ambient temps Cooler used Chip used motherboard film size exact length of time used. This should be a very, very interesting test!!!! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| | |
| | #153 | |
| Helper Person In General Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 1,585
| Quote:
The only thing I would change for simplicity in compiling the data is using a set time used. I guess in theory something like 10 min (a guess pulled from thin air) would be good. What needs attention this needs to be done religiously by all in the same manner. Just my take... Ron | |
| | |
| | #155 | |
| Silence..Or I kill you! | Quote:
As you mentioned IC, 10-15min would be plenty of time. You set the time, 10 minutes, or say 15 minutes? But be sure to concur this with all of the other sites as well ![]() | |
| | |
| | #156 |
| Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 143
| I am trying to consolidate results here so I went through the post results and this is what I came up with so far with about 50% reporting. I am only looking at the load temps. Some were averaged, some were interpolated. I am looking for corrections understated/overstated, missed or double entry. please review when you get a chance and suggest changes where differences occur. Thanks dedgar 0 theburan 1 RangerXLT8 -8 Yellowhello -2 drew and not u -1.5 Jokerswild -4 RangerXLT8 -5 RangerXLT8 -3 Quakindude -4 Quakindude -3.5 RAID -1 RAID -2 polobunny -3 simple_inhibition -5 screwballl -9 onebxr -5 wtcnbrwndo4u -9 stinger608 -5 |
| | |
| | #157 |
| oh noes | I still think that I may have used to little ic7d when I put mine one... I'm gonna have to pull out my cpu later to today to test a mobo I have coming, so when I put it back, I'll probably just put whatever I have left in my first tube of ic7d onto the chip and see what happens, lol. ![]() e8500@4ghz|Asus P5k-e WiFi| 4gb OCZ ReaperX|2x 3870's|1.3tb storage space|MSI tv tuner. |
| | |
| | #158 | |
| Edging towards disaster Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Third rock from the sun.
Posts: 126
| Quote:
Changed the mobo to a GA-G33M-S2L, cpu is a Q6600 and the memory is now A-Data DDR2 800. When I took the heatsink off to clean up the E6600 that was in there, I noticed that the TIM layer was very thick. That is probably why the temps I reported didn't change for the better. I am glad that IC7 does so well at thermal transfer as I probably would have had a fried CPU with something else or at least reduced clocks. This was the 2nd system to get the IC7. The first I tried to spread the TIM and this time I used a pea sized blob. (Probably a little too big a blob.) I changed out the mobo, CPU and memory. Put everything back together (with a little less TIM this time). The Q6600 is OC'd to 3.555GHZ (9X395). Voltage in the BIOS is set to 1.4 volts. Everest tells me that the CPU core volts are 1.28 and a temp of 53C. Gigabytes Easy Tune 5 give CPU volts as 1.3 and CPU temp as 53C. Currently running a F@H WU 3043 (1461 pts) as my stress test with 7m 15s avg frame times for 2902 PPD. So I've got that Q6600 pretty well cranked with a less than optimal HS (Zalman 9500) and the temps are well under 60C. That's my update. Intel E8400 - EVGA 780i mobo Zalman 9700NT - 8 Gig Crucial DDR2-800 Two EVGA GTX260's in SLI PC P & C 750 watt - Samsung 216BW LCD Samsung DVD-RW - Logitec Z-640 speakers Linksys WRT54GL Router - CM 690 Case Seagate 250gig - Vista Home Premium 64bit | |
| | |
| | #159 |
| Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 143
| For those getting the pressure film next week and want to get an Idea what a raw data test looks like. Innovation Cooling's Diamond 7 TIM test results - Page 10 - XtremeSystems Forums |
| | |
| | #160 |
| oh noes | Looks like some cool stuff! Can't wait to get my hands on it, lol... ![]() e8500@4ghz|Asus P5k-e WiFi| 4gb OCZ ReaperX|2x 3870's|1.3tb storage space|MSI tv tuner. |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| icd, icd7, results, thermal compound, thread |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Any Q9450 OC results yet? | Tech Geek Deluxe | Overclocking | 16 | April 7th, 2008 22:02 |
| AVG results | oldman_gamer | Troubleshooting | 6 | February 28th, 2008 15:47 |
| Overclocking lowers results? | Stormcrow | Troubleshooting | 10 | August 4th, 2007 16:10 |
| 3DMark 05 Results Right? | XoRn | General Computing | 0 | April 22nd, 2007 21:27 |
| 7950 GT OC results | nhobo | Graphics | 0 | December 29th, 2006 13:14 |