![]() |
| | #221 | |||||||||||||||
| F Ucn rd dis U mst uzUNIX
| Quote:
They cup from more material being in the corners which tend not to shrink as much as the thin flat sections. The process has changed and constantly evaluated...and getting MUCH better. If you take a peek at a Penryn, Conroe, and Pentium in the same way you see new edging and a much better surface on the Penryn. It's more of a forging process now. And there's a small square detent to take up the expansion/contraction slack so the edges don't have a desire to end up being higher. Lapping in itself should show some real life gains. It's just perfecting a pretty good process, like blueprinting an engine. What is expected though are very very minute gains. On our end; You can lose 1C, see it, and claim victory, and conclude. But you can also lose 1C just from re-seating a unit with no extra work. To get a result on our end, 10 resets should be made and the averages used. If the average is still 1C Delta, then victory is pretty relative to the work just done isn't it? Also, lapping should stop at flat and not carried over to shiny...as well as flat relative to the mounting parallel and not just flat. | |||||||||||||||
| | | |||||||||||||||
| | #222 | ||||||||||||||
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 121
| SiGfever 2.65 loss in performance XSF Dtek FuZion WB (MX-2 TIM, large BB size dolop) (mounted 3/18/8, 15.5mm from top of knurled nut to top of the mounting plate) w/Backplate. D5 Vario @5 MCR320QP w/ 3 80cfm fans in pull configuration T-Line 7/16"id x 5/8"od MasterKleer Specs: Q6600 G0 vid = 1.2375 Abit IP35 Pro v1.1 bios = 14 Corsair 2 x 1Gb 6400c4 (5,5,5,15...1.9v) Settings: vcore listed: 1.4275v vcore real: 1.35v Buss Speed: 396 vMCH: 1.29 vICH: 1.09 Multi: 9 Core Speed: 3564 CPU VTT: 1.23 ICHIO: 1.55 CpuGtlref 0/2: 68% CpuGtlref 1/3: 68% PCI-E Clock: 101 Last edited by IC Diamond 7; May 7th, 2008 at 17:31. | ||||||||||||||
| | | ||||||||||||||
| | #223 | ||||||||||||||
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 121
| SiGfever 2.65 loss in performance XSF -continued edit later for specs | ||||||||||||||
| | | ||||||||||||||
| | #224 | |||||||||||||||
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 121
| Quote:
http://download.intel.com/design/pro...s/31685201.pdf page 32. flat .05mm -parallel .203 Interesting the forging part. Still sheet metal, you ever get any flexing of the IHS? Some of these high pressure contact areas loading up to the 85 psi of the film on one side of the lid. | |||||||||||||||
| | | |||||||||||||||
| | #225 | ||||||||||||||
| HardwareLogic's Otis Campbell (retired from Mayberry)
| Hey IC, got the film in the mail today ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Dang man, do you think you included enough IC Diamond TIM ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Will get on this in the next few days!!! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ||||||||||||||
| | | ||||||||||||||
| | #226 | |||||||||||||||
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 121
| Quote:
Yeah, You got rolled into into another mailing subtest group. It was too much trouble to sort in the short time to make the mail that day. Sorry! No special affection there | |||||||||||||||
| | | |||||||||||||||
| | #227 | ||||||||||||||
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 121
| Poll - what do you guys think of the Raw contact film as a diagnostic tool for contact/pressure issues? | ||||||||||||||
| | | ||||||||||||||
| | #228 | |||||||||||||||
| Deus Sol Invictus
| Quote:
Certain setups it's VERY hard to position properly while putting the heatsink on. Not really the film fault, mostly the mounting mechanism. Other inconvenience would be that you have no idea how to correct a pressure that is too low, it's trial and error (add a washer/screw more depending on your configuration). Again though, it's not something about the film itself but the mounting. So overall, I think it's a good and inexpensive tool for someone wanting to find out if he's using his heatsink optimally. ![]() If there is a final hour, let's hope for a higher power. One by one, and two by two, I have ammo, what about you? | |||||||||||||||
| | | |||||||||||||||
| | #229 | ||||||||||||||
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 121
| Pressure film results up - I will post here but takes some reformatting of the pics so it will take me a few days here [OFFICIAL] Free ICD7 thermal compound for OCF members Results Thread - Page 11 - Overclockers Forums and here Innovation Cooling's Diamond 7 TIM test results - Page 25 - XtremeSystems Forums | ||||||||||||||
| | | ||||||||||||||
| | #230 | ||||||||||||||
| socket 939 junkie
| hey! i think im 8A and 8B on that list hehehe E8400 @ 4ghz (500x8 @ 1.35v) Gigabyte X38-DQ6 2x2GB G-Skill DDR2 1000 @ DDR2 1000 5-5-5-15 2.1v 2 Sapphire ATi Radeon HD3870 in Crossfire Seagate 7200.11 500GB 32MB Cache HDD Audigy 2 ZS Gamer Silverstone DA750 Samsung Dual Layer DVD Burner Lian Li G70WB Thermochill PA120.3|Swiftech Storm Rev.2|Swiftech MCP 655 | ||||||||||||||
| | | ||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| heatsink pressure, icd7, thermal compound |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Any Q9450 OC results yet? | Tech Geek Deluxe | Overclocking | 16 | April 7th, 2008 21:02 |
| AVG results | oldman_gamer | Troubleshooting | 6 | February 28th, 2008 14:47 |
| My New Build and Overclock Results | Kent10 | Overclocking | 14 | October 9th, 2007 09:07 |
| 3DMark 05 Results Right? | XoRn | General Computing | 0 | April 22nd, 2007 20:27 |
| 7950 GT OC results | nhobo | Graphics | 0 | December 29th, 2006 12:14 |