HardwareLogic

Go Back   HardwareLogic > Specific Hardware > Cooling
Home Forums Rules All AlbumsBlogs Donate Subscriptions Register Mark Forums Read vBExperience

Cooling From air to extreme, all your cooling questions and issues are addressed here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old May 7th, 2008   #221
F Ucn rd dis U mst uzUNIX
Points: 1,071, Level: 17
Points: 1,071, Level: 17 Points: 1,071, Level: 17 Points: 1,071, Level: 17
Activity: 72%
Activity: 72% Activity: 72% Activity: 72%
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: South of Heaven
Posts: 378
Blog Entries: 1
Default Re: IC Diamond 7 Carat Thermal Compound Results Th

Quote:
Originally Posted by IC Diamond 7 View Post
There are going to be more lapping results as we go several other forums are doing this and a few are doing a lap test. I was never big on lapping but the contact tests raised my interest in it as it might be very effective. But again we shall see and hopefully result will be clear enough to make a conclusion one way or another, we may find it does not make a diff in any of it.
Not to go into the resume thing, but this was a huge project I was part of about 2 years ago. What started as a production QC turned into...something else. The tolerance on IHS's are really pretty good compared to older IHS units. Like Snell testing or something of that sort, units are pulled in the batch units and checked for tolerance. If one falls out of tolerance, the entire batch get new hats. But what was clear is that a certain degree of cupping is fine. A few make it through, but it's not as rampant as we'd think. If 1,000 units are within tolerance, about .03 of these are just slightly more cupped and just fall through the gaps.

They cup from more material being in the corners which tend not to shrink as much as the thin flat sections. The process has changed and constantly evaluated...and getting MUCH better. If you take a peek at a Penryn, Conroe, and Pentium in the same way you see new edging and a much better surface on the Penryn. It's more of a forging process now. And there's a small square detent to take up the expansion/contraction slack so the edges don't have a desire to end up being higher.

Lapping in itself should show some real life gains. It's just perfecting a pretty good process, like blueprinting an engine. What is expected though are very very minute gains. On our end; You can lose 1C, see it, and claim victory, and conclude. But you can also lose 1C just from re-seating a unit with no extra work. To get a result on our end, 10 resets should be made and the averages used. If the average is still 1C Delta, then victory is pretty relative to the work just done isn't it? Also, lapping should stop at flat and not carried over to shiny...as well as flat relative to the mounting parallel and not just flat.



Boy'nBlack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 7th, 2008   #222
Points: 565, Level: 11
Points: 565, Level: 11 Points: 565, Level: 11 Points: 565, Level: 11
Activity: 11%
Activity: 11% Activity: 11% Activity: 11%
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 121
Default Re: IC Diamond 7 Carat Thermal Compound Results Th

SiGfever 2.65 loss in performance XSF

Dtek FuZion WB (MX-2 TIM, large BB size dolop) (mounted 3/18/8, 15.5mm from top of knurled nut to top of the mounting plate) w/Backplate.
D5 Vario @5
MCR320QP w/ 3 80cfm fans in pull configuration
T-Line
7/16"id x 5/8"od MasterKleer

Specs:
Q6600 G0 vid = 1.2375
Abit IP35 Pro v1.1 bios = 14
Corsair 2 x 1Gb 6400c4 (5,5,5,15...1.9v)

Settings:
vcore listed: 1.4275v
vcore real: 1.35v
Buss Speed: 396
vMCH: 1.29
vICH: 1.09
Multi: 9
Core Speed: 3564
CPU VTT: 1.23
ICHIO: 1.55
CpuGtlref 0/2: 68%
CpuGtlref 1/3: 68%
PCI-E Clock: 101
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2brawimagesm.JPG (41.8 KB, 2 views)
File Type: jpg histogramsmall.JPG (32.7 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg 2blinescan75%90%.JPG (32.0 KB, 0 views)

Last edited by IC Diamond 7; May 7th, 2008 at 17:31.
IC Diamond 7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 7th, 2008   #223
Points: 565, Level: 11
Points: 565, Level: 11 Points: 565, Level: 11 Points: 565, Level: 11
Activity: 11%
Activity: 11% Activity: 11% Activity: 11%
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 121
Default Re: IC Diamond 7 Carat Thermal Compound Results Th

SiGfever 2.65 loss in performance XSF -continued

edit later for specs
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2d3dlg.JPG (45.3 KB, 5 views)
IC Diamond 7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 7th, 2008   #224
Points: 565, Level: 11
Points: 565, Level: 11 Points: 565, Level: 11 Points: 565, Level: 11
Activity: 11%
Activity: 11% Activity: 11% Activity: 11%
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 121
Default Re: IC Diamond 7 Carat Thermal Compound Results Th

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boy'nBlack View Post
Not to go into the resume thing, but this was a huge project I was part of about 2 years ago. What started as a production QC turned into...something else. The tolerance on IHS's are really pretty good compared to older IHS units. Like Snell testing or something of that sort, units are pulled in the batch units and checked for tolerance. If one falls out of tolerance, the entire batch get new hats. But what was clear is that a certain degree of cupping is fine. A few make it through, but it's not as rampant as we'd think. If 1,000 units are within tolerance, about .03 of these are just slightly more cupped and just fall through the gaps.

They cup from more material being in the corners which tend not to shrink as much as the thin flat sections. The process has changed and constantly evaluated...and getting MUCH better. If you take a peek at a Penryn, Conroe, and Pentium in the same way you see new edging and a much better surface on the Penryn. It's more of a forging process now. And there's a small square detent to take up the expansion/contraction slack so the edges don't have a desire to end up being higher.

Lapping in itself should show some real life gains. It's just perfecting a pretty good process, like blueprinting an engine. What is expected though are very very minute gains. On our end; You can lose 1C, see it, and claim victory, and conclude. But you can also lose 1C just from re-seating a unit with no extra work. To get a result on our end, 10 resets should be made and the averages used. If the average is still 1C Delta, then victory is pretty relative to the work just done isn't it? Also, lapping should stop at flat and not carried over to shiny...as well as flat relative to the mounting parallel and not just flat.
Here you go.

http://download.intel.com/design/pro...s/31685201.pdf

page 32. flat .05mm -parallel .203

Interesting the forging part. Still sheet metal, you ever get any flexing of the IHS? Some of these high pressure contact areas loading up to the 85 psi of the film on one side of the lid.
IC Diamond 7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 12th, 2008   #225
HardwareLogic's Otis Campbell (retired from Mayberry)
Points: 9,463, Level: 65
Points: 9,463, Level: 65 Points: 9,463, Level: 65 Points: 9,463, Level: 65
Activity: 70%
Activity: 70% Activity: 70% Activity: 70%
 
stinger608's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 1936-2006
Posts: 2,416
Blog Entries: 1
Default Re: IC Diamond 7 Carat Thermal Compound Results Th

Hey IC, got the film in the mail today

Dang man, do you think you included enough IC Diamond TIM

Will get on this in the next few days!!!



stinger608 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 12th, 2008   #226
Points: 565, Level: 11
Points: 565, Level: 11 Points: 565, Level: 11 Points: 565, Level: 11
Activity: 11%
Activity: 11% Activity: 11% Activity: 11%
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 121
Default Re: IC Diamond 7 Carat Thermal Compound Results Th

Quote:
Originally Posted by stinger608 View Post
Hey IC, got the film in the mail today

Dang man, do you think you included enough IC Diamond TIM

Will get on this in the next few days!!!

Yeah, You got rolled into into another mailing subtest group. It was too much trouble to sort in the short time to make the mail that day.

Sorry! No special affection there
IC Diamond 7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 14th, 2008   #227
Points: 565, Level: 11
Points: 565, Level: 11 Points: 565, Level: 11 Points: 565, Level: 11
Activity: 11%
Activity: 11% Activity: 11% Activity: 11%
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 121
Default Re: IC Diamond 7 Carat Thermal Compound Results Th

Poll - what do you guys think of the Raw contact film as a diagnostic tool for contact/pressure issues?
IC Diamond 7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 14th, 2008   #228
Deus Sol Invictus
Points: 11,869, Level: 71
Points: 11,869, Level: 71 Points: 11,869, Level: 71 Points: 11,869, Level: 71
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
 
polobunny's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,278
Blog Entries: 5
Default Re: IC Diamond 7 Carat Thermal Compound Results Th

Quote:
Originally Posted by IC Diamond 7 View Post
Poll - what do you guys think of the Raw contact film as a diagnostic tool for contact/pressure issues?
It's a good indicator but there's a few inconveniences.
Certain setups it's VERY hard to position properly while putting the heatsink on. Not really the film fault, mostly the mounting mechanism.
Other inconvenience would be that you have no idea how to correct a pressure that is too low, it's trial and error (add a washer/screw more depending on your configuration). Again though, it's not something about the film itself but the mounting.
So overall, I think it's a good and inexpensive tool for someone wanting to find out if he's using his heatsink optimally.




If there is a final hour, let's hope for a higher power. One by one, and two by two, I have ammo, what about you?
polobunny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 29th, 2008   #229
Points: 565, Level: 11
Points: 565, Level: 11 Points: 565, Level: 11 Points: 565, Level: 11
Activity: 11%
Activity: 11% Activity: 11% Activity: 11%
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 121
Default Re: ICD 7 Results Thread

Pressure film results up - I will post here but takes some reformatting of the pics so it will take me a few days

here

[OFFICIAL] Free ICD7 thermal compound for OCF members Results Thread - Page 11 - Overclockers Forums

and here

Innovation Cooling's Diamond 7 TIM test results - Page 25 - XtremeSystems Forums
IC Diamond 7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 29th, 2008   #230
socket 939 junkie
Points: 6,543, Level: 52
Points: 6,543, Level: 52 Points: 6,543, Level: 52 Points: 6,543, Level: 52
Activity: 58%
Activity: 58% Activity: 58% Activity: 58%
 
simple_inhibition's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In front of my pc in Ft Bragg XD
Posts: 1,400
Blog Entries: 1
Default Re: ICD 7 Results Thread

hey! i think im 8A and 8B on that list hehehe



E8400 @ 4ghz (500x8 @ 1.35v)
Gigabyte X38-DQ6
2x2GB G-Skill DDR2 1000 @ DDR2 1000 5-5-5-15 2.1v
2 Sapphire ATi Radeon HD3870 in Crossfire
Seagate 7200.11 500GB 32MB Cache HDD
Audigy 2 ZS Gamer
Silverstone DA750
Samsung Dual Layer DVD Burner
Lian Li G70WB
Thermochill PA120.3|Swiftech Storm Rev.2|Swiftech MCP 655
simple_inhibition is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  HardwareLogic > Specific Hardware > Cooling

Tags
heatsink pressure, icd7, thermal compound


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any Q9450 OC results yet? Tech Geek Deluxe Overclocking 16 April 7th, 2008 21:02
AVG results oldman_gamer Troubleshooting 6 February 28th, 2008 14:47
My New Build and Overclock Results Kent10 Overclocking 14 October 9th, 2007 09:07
3DMark 05 Results Right? XoRn General Computing 0 April 22nd, 2007 20:27
7950 GT OC results nhobo Graphics 0 December 29th, 2006 12:14


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 13:58.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
© HardwareLogic 2005 - 2008. All Rights Reserved


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45