![]() |
| |||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | All Albums | Blogs | Subscriptions | Register | Mark Forums Read |
| Cooling From air to extreme, all your cooling questions and issues are addressed here. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack (21) | Thread Tools |
| | #61 | |||
| Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 6
| Quote:
Quote:
1) Pretty much any current compound works well enough in most people's hands. 2) The companies don't want to make apples-to-apples comparisons, because their products aren't clearly better than the others. In other words, the field is pretty much marketing driven, so no company has an interest in the truth. Quote:
For now, I'm just bloviating, so have your pinches of salt ready, but I'm hoping to get an analytical balance (sub-mg resolution) in the near future, so we'll see what the future holds. Gutsily OCing my way to the promised Ubuntuland e2160@3GHz | |||
| | |
| | #62 |
| Colonel Calamity | but if you look at the story of which ones ranked best and their prices, you will see that pretty much all of them are around the same volume and most vendors have them for pretty close to the same price. So now that price isn't a factor, may as well go with the best rather than what you have been using. $9.57 - TX-2 3.5g $10.98 - AS5 3.5g $12.05 - ICD7 1.5g (but the thickest of the bunch) $12.07 - OCZ 3g $12.57 - MX2 4g so if you look at price based in our story alone, your best bet is the TX-2 EDIT: Edited to including shipping, and ranked in order of cost One4yu2c ![]() Thanks HL and Corsair! My opinions are my own and not representative of this site or its members. Last edited by screwballl; March 8th, 2008 at 19:00. |
| | |
| | #63 |
| We take both criticism and positive comments very positively | Evidently you didn't read the review, or look too closely at the test results......at a default clock speed of 3GHz, there was approximately a 13C difference between the best and worst compounds.....to the average user....who will likely never apply thermal compound, thats no problem.....but to those who tinker and want the best possible solution....13C is to a significant difference....like going from a stock INTEL cooler to a high end air cooler or even modest water cooling.....for those people, whats the sense of investing in a cooler upgrade only to put something thats going to hinder the performance? The thing I find ironic about the whole AS5 argument goes back to the cure time. I keep hearing this argument about the 200 hours for optimal cure time....as often as the average enthusiast changes coolers, processors, motherboards, etc......its not worth the trouble to keep reapplying AS5. As far as this conversation, it seems to be spinning its wheels.....I'm not sure what your point is, other than to just say you disagree......A lot of time, effort, and thought went into this because its been a big topic of conversation not just here, but around various forums on the web. Conversly, the average user who is just going to install their hardware and never bother with it again is typically the kind of person who doesn't overclock enough for it to make any real difference. I'm in no way bashing Arctic Silver, or AS5...I use Luminere for testing, and have always really liked Ceramique, especially for extreme cooling...as I've said all through this, silver based thermal compounds are just passe considering the alternatives. INTEL E8400 // Gigabyte EP45 Extreme // 4GB DDR3-1600 // Palit HD 4870 // Antec 1200 // Seagate 750GB HDD // Zalman CNPS9700 // BFG ES 800W PSU |
| | |
| | #64 |
| I don't know how to put this, but, I'm kind of a big deal. | Valid point, but with limited appeal. For the neighbor/friend/relative who needs thermal paste and needs it right now, Arctic Silver 5 from the local mom/pop store is likely the best bet. But on a computer forum, nearly everyone seeking buying advice is doing so with the intention of ordering online, usually as part of a new build or coupled with a new cooler purchase. With that in mind, I can't think of a good reason not to recommend one of the several better performing, less expensive pastes available... |
| | |
| | #65 |
| Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 6
| Yes, it's good to have such a list handy (thanks for reordering it One4). Gutsily OCing my way to the promised Ubuntuland e2160@3GHz |
| | |
| | #66 | |
| Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 6
| Quote:
Anyway, enough of my bloviating -- time to try to generate some data. Gutsily OCing my way to the promised Ubuntuland e2160@3GHz | |
| | |
| | #67 |
| 5GHz 24/7 Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,138
| i have as5, mx-2 and icd7 on hand. i'll be using icd7 from now on. |
| | |
| | #68 |
| Foto Lord Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Pacific Grove, CA
Posts: 4,387
| I've only ever used AS5, AS Ceramique, and ICD7. I really like ICD7, but I plan on picking up some MX-2 in the future. E8400 DFI Blood Iron P35-T2RL 4GB G.Skill 800MHz Sapphire Radeon HD3870 512MB Silverstone DA650W WD 250GB + Seagate 320GB |
| | |
| | #69 |
| Colonel Calamity | I personally have used several of them through the years but ti has been mostly AS5 until recently when ICD7 took over as my choice due to 5-10ºC lower temps and also because AS5 showed a bake in with traces and such showing after I removed the heatsink... now only AS5 on my Athlon XPs until its gone (or I toss it). ![]() Thanks HL and Corsair! My opinions are my own and not representative of this site or its members. |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| compound, hardwarelogic, thermal |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Thermal Compound Application | Kent10 | Cooling | 3 | August 25th, 2008 17:06 |
| Should I change my thermal compound? | Gig-O-Ram | Cooling | 12 | June 16th, 2008 06:58 |
| Do I need Thermal Compound for my Q9450? | b0nk3r | Processors | 29 | May 24th, 2008 12:09 |
| Arctic Silver 5 Thermal Compound | Xtremeoverclocking | Troubleshooting | 9 | July 26th, 2007 06:02 |
| Does Thermal Compound Matter | Computer-Ed | User Guides/Reviews | 17 | May 29th, 2007 21:08 |