HardwareLogic

Go Back   HardwareLogic > Specific Hardware > Graphics
Home Forums Rules All AlbumsBlogs Subscriptions Register Mark Forums Read

Graphics Covering everything from drivers to overclocking. If you need help with a Video Card, this is the place.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old March 20th, 2006   #11
 
Tyreal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 2,557
Default

Personally, i think we still have a long way to go before we will need 1 KW powersupplies. A top of the line system right now will handle fine on a quality 500W powersupply.

Consider this: A guy name Electron chaser on OCF is running a one KW powersupply. He is running the following hardware:
Abit IC7-MAX3
Pentium 4 3.4 @ 3.81 Extreme Edition Gallatin Core
BFG 6800 Ultra 470
1 GB PQI PC4400

Along with a phase change system, a water cooling system and a ton of Delta Fans. So you can see how much power 1 KW actually is.

EDIT: oh yea. Yes there is 2 X 2GB kits.




I Like Watercooling. D-Tek Fuzion, MCP655, MCR220
Tyreal is offline  
Old March 20th, 2006   #12
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 97
Default

Quad SLI? How novel. I'll put money that remains a concept and only sells to a limited audience. Very powerful, yes but rather than fit four 4-cylinder engines into a truck to give it the torque/boost to go, why not build one 16-cylinder engine? The technology and architecture just needs to be refined. One engine will surely prove to be more efficient than four independently running engines.



MOBO: Asus A8N32-SLI
CPU: Opteron 165
HDD: WD 320GB/16MB/SATA
RAM: 2GB OCZ Gold XTC PC4000
ROM: NEC 3550a DL DVD/CD Burner
Video: Geforce 7900GT Extreme
Case: Thermaltake Armor/aluminum
PSU: Thermaltake 600w purepower
OS: Windows XP Professional
gwhea38411 is offline  
Old March 20th, 2006   #13
 
fps justin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,199
Default

i agree, but suppose that 16 cylinder engine was not invented until 2 years later. Then some people being impatient may want to buy four 4 cylinder engines.

And that was a stupid question. I see there are 8 gig ram sticks.

EDIT: 2 7900 gt could use the better of 300w, so in the future when more people upgrade, more than 500 W would be advisable, or at least, for now. (unless they find some miricle energy saving core.

EDIT 2: www.thetechzone.com/photo/computers.php?photo=6151 Now THATS what i call one fat ass ram stick.



E2140 @ 375 x 8 = 3.0ghz
2x1 ocz system 1337s pc2-6400 5-5-5-15 @ 450mhz
gigabyte P35 S3L
eVGA 7600GT Stock
120 gig seagate
ULTRA X-Finity 600w
Sonata 2 w/ top fan
G5 Lazer Mouse
fps justin is offline  
Old March 20th, 2006   #14
 
Tyreal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 2,557
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gwhea38411
Quad SLI? How novel. I'll put money that remains a concept and only sells to a limited audience. Very powerful, yes but rather than fit four 4-cylinder engines into a truck to give it the torque/boost to go, why not build one 16-cylinder engine? The technology and architecture just needs to be refined. One engine will surely prove to be more efficient than four independently running engines.
I actually agree with gwhea. He makes a good point. I would rather see them stick with the standard SLI but refine the cards themselves and make them faster.




I Like Watercooling. D-Tek Fuzion, MCP655, MCR220
Tyreal is offline  
Old March 20th, 2006   #15
 
fps justin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,199
Default

well actually. I find this as a very good option for people. When they refine the cards, then you get use THOSE cards and put them in quad SLI. Having quad doesn't hurt anyone, rather gives a nice little option for all the rich people out there.



E2140 @ 375 x 8 = 3.0ghz
2x1 ocz system 1337s pc2-6400 5-5-5-15 @ 450mhz
gigabyte P35 S3L
eVGA 7600GT Stock
120 gig seagate
ULTRA X-Finity 600w
Sonata 2 w/ top fan
G5 Lazer Mouse
fps justin is offline  
Old March 20th, 2006   #16
Modder-ator
 
gvblake22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tempe Desert
Posts: 6,417
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyreal
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwhea38411
Quad SLI? How novel. I'll put money that remains a concept and only sells to a limited audience. Very powerful, yes but rather than fit four 4-cylinder engines into a truck to give it the torque/boost to go, why not build one 16-cylinder engine? The technology and architecture just needs to be refined. One engine will surely prove to be more efficient than four independently running engines.
I actually agree with gwhea. He makes a good point. I would rather see them stick with the standard SLI but refine the cards themselves and make them faster.
Yeah, I totally agree too. I would take a single card solution over a multiple card solution anyday.



gvblake22 is online now  
Old March 20th, 2006   #17
 
Tyreal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 2,557
Default

Quote:
unless they find some miricle energy saving core.
This is what the Venice cores where to the Athlon 64s. They ran like a normal Athlon 64 except they were able to operate at a low voltage. Thats why you get such low temps as 25C or maybe 35C




I Like Watercooling. D-Tek Fuzion, MCP655, MCR220
Tyreal is offline  
Old March 20th, 2006   #18
 
fps justin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,199
Default

or the Toledo cores.



E2140 @ 375 x 8 = 3.0ghz
2x1 ocz system 1337s pc2-6400 5-5-5-15 @ 450mhz
gigabyte P35 S3L
eVGA 7600GT Stock
120 gig seagate
ULTRA X-Finity 600w
Sonata 2 w/ top fan
G5 Lazer Mouse
fps justin is offline  
Old March 20th, 2006   #19
 
Tyreal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 2,557
Default

The Toledo is an X2 Dual Core. It puts out 110W of power. It is lower than some of the other X2s but it certainly still isn't low.

If anything. The Manchester Cores set the standard for energy efficiency and price/performance ratio. (X2s)




I Like Watercooling. D-Tek Fuzion, MCP655, MCR220
Tyreal is offline  
Closed Thread

  HardwareLogic > Specific Hardware > Graphics

Tags
announces, nvidia, quad


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nvidia video: No quad-core chip needed Capper General Computing 9 June 21st, 2008 06:52
The most sophisticated piece of technology you will ever pee on Zambini HL Lounge 6 January 7th, 2007 15:59
AMD Announces NATIVE quad core CPU tape out Lead Head Processors 5 August 15th, 2006 14:23
Nvidia announces SLI-accelerated physics gvblake22 Graphics 8 March 22nd, 2006 14:57
NVIDIA Announces the GeForce 7300 LE and 7600 GS gvblake22 Graphics 1 March 22nd, 2006 14:43


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:48.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
© HardwareLogic 2005 - 2008. All Rights Reserved


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49