Quad FX! - Page 3

polobunny · December 29th, 2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by gvblake22

Yep, very true.

(and at you quoting yourself)

I was quoting myself to show you how even the biggest ****** know about AMD marketing gimmick thingamajig. Laugh though, it's good for the health.

Panda Man · December 29th, 2006

I'm sure you were, you crazy french canadians

With as many AMD fan boys as there are, I don't think AMD is in too big a chance of failing.

**gvblake22** · December 29th, 2006

No, AMD isn't gonna fail from the launch of Quad FX. And there are also an equal number of fanboys for every company, they are a unique bunch....

polobunny · December 29th, 2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by Panda Man

With as many AMD fan boys as there are, I don't AMD is in too big a chance of failing.

If one thing is sure, it's obviously that you don't think. :P

Nah AMD won't die because they launched QuadFX or because Intel has the market with their C2D's atm. After all Intel wasn't better than dead before C2D, their Pentium D were just stalling at the same boring speed and same boring performances. C2D arrival is a good thing, forces AMD to make something even better.

Panda Man · December 29th, 2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by polobunny

If one thing is sure, it's obviously that you don't think. :P

d'oh! I have a mild cold and a head ache, gimme a break!

<takes more asprin>*gulp*</takes more asprin>

And yea, I think C2D will make AMD make something better quickly. I can see this developing into another nVidia/ATi battle soon

polobunny · December 29th, 2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by Panda Man

And yea, I think C2D will make AMD make something better quickly. I can see this developing into another nVidia/ATi battle soon

Heh, epic stuff. Longer than Star Wars. :P
It's great though because Intel knows they're not so far upfront so everybody's working hard at it.
R&D costs must be pretty high at the moment.

**gvblake22** · December 29th, 2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by polobunny

R&D costs must be pretty high at the moment.

As well they should be! Those fat cat AMD and Intel heads should be crankin' out new technology like it's their job... Oh wait... IT IS!!!!

wtcnbrwndo4u · December 29th, 2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by polobunny

Heh, epic stuff. Longer than Star Wars. :P
It's great though because Intel knows they're not so far upfront so everybody's working hard at it.
R&D costs must be pretty high at the moment.

Well of course, Star Wars lasted what, 13 hours?

December 29th, 2006	#22
Panda Man Meow means woof in cat. Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Elba, AL Posts: 1,910	Re: Quad FX! I'm sure you were, you crazy french canadians With as many AMD fan boys as there are, I don't think AMD is in too big a chance of failing. Intel Core 2 Duo E6420 Conroe @ 2.80GHz Cooler Master GeminII - Thanks Rich and HL! GIGABYTE GA-965P-DS3 (rev. 1.3) EVGA GeForce 8800GTS 320MB @ 726/962 CORSAIR XMS2 4GB (4 x 1GB) DDR2-800 OCZ GameXStream 600W PSU Maxtor 300GB 7200RPM SATA150 16MB cache HDD Seagate 500GB 7200ROM SATA300 16mb cache HDD Sony NEC Optiarc 18X DVD±R DVD Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi XtremeMusic 7.1 ZyXel m-202 802.11g adapter Antec Nine Hundred Creative 5.1 speakers Viewsonic Optiquest q20wb 20" LCD Last edited by Panda Man; December 29th, 2006 at 09:25.

December 29th, 2006	#23
gvblake22 Modder-ator Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Tempe Desert Posts: 6,475 Blog Entries: 1	Re: Quad FX! No, AMD isn't gonna fail from the launch of Quad FX. And there are also an equal number of fanboys for every company, they are a unique bunch....

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Want Quad Core? Get the G0 X3210	fps justin	Processors	11	November 14th, 2007 08:46
quad SLI	Death_blooms	Graphics	8	April 11th, 2007 17:48
QX6700 vs. Quad FX 74	fps justin	Processors	11	December 2nd, 2006 13:00
Quad-SLI Drivers Now Available...	One4yu2c	Graphics	2	August 9th, 2006 22:49
Quad SLI	mb1955	Graphics	1	May 1st, 2006 15:05